thinning out an apple tree (was ot outhouse express etc.)

updated thu 13 oct 05

james allAn on thu 13 oct 05

------=_NextPart_84815C5ABAF209EF376268C8
Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII

My son waits for the village to drop dirt it has to get rid of nearby. Meanwhile I have 5 big piles of dirt to mow around. Might be years before there is enough to get a dozer in to level it. As to the apple trees one load there would need to be leveled by hand anyway. It's stupid because every load that comes in goes in the field not near the trees. I could probably take care of the trees before any dirt gets put there. I estimate three seasons to fill the depression. Maybe a good fast starting grass would make him happy with my slow filling in. Maybe I could grow and cut sod to cover the compost I use for fill. I am preparing an area of the railroad bank near the garden for green manure. Maybe I should use it for grass sod around the trees. I Wonder what grass would take to transplanting best in my area.

James Allan
jallan6977@earthlink.net
EarthLink Revolves the almighty dollar

I just re-read this post and have a question. By shoots, do you mean the entire branch back to the trunk of the tree. If so, that makes sense and should make identification easier.

Hi Jim
Depending on how thick those trees still are, it might yet be main shoots which need reducing further. These big branches should ideally have close to foot of clear space all round them. if they are too crowded together they will be likely to harbour pests and diseases and in any case their leaves and fruits will be too crowded to get enough light.

What I had in mind though was looking at the main branches and taking off some of their side shoots so that they are not too close spaced. Just as when removing a main stem these should be cut right back to their origins and no stumps left, or they will be right back.

Starting from the base of a branch, where it meets the trunk, I would remove entirely any side shoot coming out in its first 1 1/2 -2 feet. Moving on from the lowest remaning shoot I should then cut out enough of its fellows to leave a spacing of at least a foot between each . If course as one approaches the tip of the branch the side shoots will get smaller and smaller and right near the top there won't be anything to remove anyway. The main thing you want to achieve is to clear the lower and most shaded parts of the tree so it concentrates on bearing its crop on the outer younger wood where the fruits will get both a good sap supply and also plenty of light.

My son is still wanting to kill the tree by adding a foot of dirt right up to the trunk. Oh well You can't teach the young, they know it all. I wish I could convince him to let me raise the ground in that area by four inches each year the right way.

He seems to be talking more than doing so far. What chance that he will not actually get round to it??

Moira
------=_NextPart_84815C5ABAF209EF376268C8








   My son waits for the village to drop dirt it has to get rid of nearby.   Meanwhile I have 5 big piles of dirt to mow around.  Might be years before there is enough to get a dozer in to level it.  As to the apple trees one load there would need to be leveled by hand anyway.  It's stupid because every load that comes in goes in the field not near the trees.  I could probably take care of the trees before any dirt gets put there.  I estimate three seasons to fill the depression.  Maybe a good fast starting grass would make him happy with my slow filling in.  Maybe I could grow and cut sod to cover the compost I use for fill.  I am  preparing an area of the railroad bank near the garden for green manure.  Maybe I should use it for grass sod around the trees.  I Wonder what grass would take to transplanting best in my area.

 


James Allan

jallan6977@earthlink.net

EarthLink Revolves the almighty dollar

 

 


----- Original Message -----

From: Tony and Moira

To: OGL@LSV.UKY.EDU

Sent: 10/13/2005 9:09:48 PM

Subject: Re: Thinning out an apple tree (was OT outhouse express etc.)



 


----- Original Message -----



Sent: Thursday, October 13, 2005 7:41 AM

Subject: Re: OT outhouse express etc.




   I just re-read this post and have a question.   By shoots, do you mean the entire branch back to the trunk of the tree.  If so, that makes sense and should make identification easier. 

  

Hi Jim

Depending on how thick those trees still are, it might  yet be  main shoots which need reducing further. These big branches should ideally have close to foot of clear space all round them. if they are too crowded together they will be likely to harbour pests and diseases and in any case their leaves  and fruits will be too crowded to get enough light.

 

What I had in mind though was looking at the main branches and taking off some of their side shoots so that they are not too close spaced. Just as when removing a main stem these should be cut right back to their origins and no stumps left, or they will be right back.

 

Starting from the base of a branch, where it meets the trunk, I would remove entirely any side shoot coming out in its first 1 1/2 -2 feet. Moving on from the lowest remaning shoot I should then cut out enough of its fellows to leave a spacing of at least a foot between each . If course as one approaches the tip of the branch the side shoots will get smaller and smaller and right near the top there won't be anything  to remove anyway. The main thing you want to achieve is to clear the lower and most shaded parts of the tree so it concentrates on bearing its crop on the outer younger wood where the fruits  will  get both a good sap supply and also plenty of light.

 

My son is still wanting to kill the tree by adding a foot of dirt right up to the trunk.  Oh well You can't teach the young, they know it all.  I wish I could convince him to let me raise the ground in that area by four inches each year the right way.

 

He seems to be talking more than doing so far. What chance that he will not actually get round to it??

 

Moira


 

 

 

------=_NextPart_84815C5ABAF209EF376268C8--

Tony and Moira on thu 13 oct 05

This is a multi-part message in MIME format.

------=_NextPart_000_0085_01C5CFEF.01658150

----- Original Message -----
From: James Allan
To: OGL@LSV.UKY.EDU
Sent: Thursday, October 13, 2005 7:41 AM
Subject: Re: OT outhouse express etc.

I just re-read this post and have a question. By shoots, do you =
mean the entire branch back to the trunk of the tree. If so, that makes =
sense and should make identification easier.

Hi Jim
Depending on how thick those trees still are, it might yet be main =
shoots which need reducing further. These big branches should ideally =
have close to foot of clear space all round them. if they are too =
crowded together they will be likely to harbour pests and diseases and =
in any case their leaves and fruits will be too crowded to get enough =
light.

What I had in mind though was looking at the main branches and taking =
off some of their side shoots so that they are not too close spaced. =
Just as when removing a main stem these should be cut right back to =
their origins and no stumps left, or they will be right back.

Starting from the base of a branch, where it meets the trunk, I would =
remove entirely any side shoot coming out in its first 1 1/2 -2 feet. =
Moving on from the lowest remaning shoot I should then cut out enough of =
its fellows to leave a spacing of at least a foot between each . If =
course as one approaches the tip of the branch the side shoots will get =
smaller and smaller and right near the top there won't be anything to =
remove anyway. The main thing you want to achieve is to clear the lower =
and most shaded parts of the tree so it concentrates on bearing its crop =
on the outer younger wood where the fruits will get both a good sap =
supply and also plenty of light.

My son is still wanting to kill the tree by adding a foot of dirt =
right up to the trunk. Oh well You can't teach the young, they know it =
all. I wish I could convince him to let me raise the ground in that =
area by four inches each year the right way.

He seems to be talking more than doing so far. What chance that he =
will not actually get round to it??

Moira

------=_NextPart_000_0085_01C5CFEF.01658150







 

style=3D"PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; =
BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
----- Original Message -----

style=3D"BACKGROUND: #e4e4e4; FONT: 10pt arial; font-color: =
black">From:
href=3D"mailto:jallan6977@EARTHLINK.NET">James
Allan

To: href=3D"mailto:OGL@LSV.UKY.EDU">OGL@LSV.UKY.EDU

Sent: Thursday, October 13, =
2005 7:41
AM

Subject: Re: OT outhouse =
express
etc.




   I just re-read this post and have a =
question.   By
shoots, do you mean the entire branch back to the trunk of the =
tree.  If
so, that makes sense and should make identification easier.  =

  

Hi Jim

Depending on how thick those trees =
still are, it
might  yet be  main shoots which need reducing further. =
These big
branches should ideally have close to foot of clear space all round =
them. if
they are too crowded together they will be likely to harbour pests and =

diseases and in any case their leaves  and fruits will be too =
crowded to
get enough light.

 

What I had in mind though was looking =
at the main
branches and taking off some of their side shoots so that they are not =
too
close spaced. Just as when removing a main stem these should be cut =
right back
to their origins and no stumps left, or they will be right
back.

 

Starting from the base of a branch, =
where it
meets the trunk, I would remove entirely any side shoot coming out =
in its
first 1 1/2 -2 feet. Moving on from the lowest remaning shoot I should =
then
cut out enough of its fellows to leave a spacing of at least a =
foot
between each . If course as one approaches the tip of the branch the =
side
shoots will get smaller and smaller and right near the top there =
won't be
anything  to remove anyway. The main thing you want to achieve is =
to
clear the lower and most shaded parts of the tree so it concentrates =
on
bearing its crop on the outer younger wood where the fruits =
 will
 get both a good sap supply and also plenty of =
light.

 

My son is still wanting to kill the tree by adding a foot of dirt =
right
up to the trunk.  Oh well You can't teach the young, they know it =

all.  I wish I could convince him to let me raise the ground in =
that area
by four inches each year the right way.

 

He seems to be talking more than =
doing so far.
What chance that he will not actually get round to it??

 

Moira


 

 

style=3D"PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; =
BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px =
solid"> 

------=_NextPart_000_0085_01C5CFEF.01658150--